VOTERS
REJECTED Constitutional Amendment #49 on the
Nov. 6, ballot, which could have eliminated the State of Illinois’
Constitutional protection of the pension benefits of University and other
public employees.
ALTHOUGH
ABOUT 56% of Illinois voters who weighed
in on the measure on their ballots cast a “yes” vote for the amendment, the law
required either a yes vote from 3/5 (60%) of the people voting on it, or 50%
plus one of the total number of votes cast in the election. The amendment
received neither.
IF
PASSED, the amendment would have required a
3/5 majority of a legislative body to increase benefits, but only a simple
majority to reduce benefits that currently are protected from reduction by the
State Constitution.
“ARTICLE XXX,
Section 5 of our State Constitution (adopted in 1970) had as its purpose the
safeguarding of the pensions of public employees,” said Ann Lousin, a faculty member at the John Marshall Law School and
outspoken opponent of the amendment. She added that the change that was “proposed
by this Amendment appears to be an attempt to circumvent or abolish those
protections. For example, it is possible that a cost-of-living adjustment could
be eliminated if this Amendment” passed.
SHE NOTED the
amendment would have done “nothing for the State's pension-funding problem,”
and, if approved, would have been “a catastrophe for Illinois.”
“THE OVERT
and covert danger of this proposal may be over but we should expect more
attacks on our pension benefits when the Illinois General Assembly reconvenes
for the veto session in late November and early December, as well as in the
opening days of the next regular legislative session in January,” said Merrill L. Gassman, President of UIC
United, the UIC chapter of the State Universities Annuitants Association. “The
legislature will be filled with a significant percentage of ‘lame ducks’ who
have nothing to gain or lose by supporting ‘pension reform.’”
No comments:
Post a Comment