And William S. Bike, APAC News
THE ILLINOIS General Assembly passed pension legislation Dec. 3 that University leaders said would “adversely impact public university employees, place higher education in Illinois at a competitive disadvantage, and ultimately weaken the state’s economy.”
THE BILL passed the Senate 30-24 and the House 62-53 just minutes later. Democratic House Speaker Michael Madigan and Republican Senate leader Christine Radogno, among other top legislators from both political parties, pushed for the plan.
“IN A statement regarding the public pension funding crisis a year ago, the University of Illinois called for a pension system that would be reasonable, responsible, sustainable and competitive with those offered by our peer institutions,” said a statement issued by U of I President Robert Easter, UIC Chancellor Paula Allen-Meares, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Chancellor Phyllis Wise, and University of Illinois at Springfield Chancellor Susan Koch.
THE PENSION measure “fails to meet those basic principles,” the statement said.
LAST APRIL, heads of all 14 Illinois public universities sent a six-point proposal to Gov. Pat Quinn and legislative leaders as a long-term solution for reforming the university pension system.
“WE ARE profoundly disappointed that in nearly three years of engaging the legislative process on this crucial issue, the State’s nine public universities’ counterproposals will not be included,” University leaders said.
THE MEASURE passed by legislators in December is complex, said Katherine Laing, executive director of the University’s Office of Governmental Relations. How it would affect UIC employees and retirees “really depends on your particular circumstances,” she said.
“IT WILL severely upset the status quo,” Laing said.
THE PENSION law would reduce cost-of-living adjustments, increase the retirement age for some employees, and put a cap on pensionable earnings. “The likely changes arguably lessen the retirement commitments made to employees and retirees, and their net effect also will harm the public higher education sector in Illinois,” University leaders said in their statement.
THE PLAN would mean less money for University employees and retirees, said David Merriman, professor of economics and public administration. “It’s potentially a very large cut in benefits,” said Merriman, faculty member in the Institute of Government and Public Affairs.
THE PENSION plan also includes a reduction in employee contributions for some participants and stronger legal requirements that the State makes its pension funding commitment.
“IT WOULD certainly improve the funding of the pension plan and move it toward stability, but it’s difficult to tell exactly how much,” Merriman said.
EXPERTS SAY the measure will be challenged in court because the Illinois Constitution says state retirement benefits “shall not be diminished or impaired.”
THE WE Are One Illinois Coalition, a labor coalition working to protect public employees’ pensions, noted in a Dec. 4 statement that the bill is 325 pages long and passed just 24 hours after legislators received it. The coalition said the bill “robs teachers, nurses, caregivers, police, and other public employees and retirees who faithfully made their pension contributions. It’s unfair, unconstitutional pension theft legislation.”
THE STATEMENT went on to say, “Make no mistake—we will sue to protect retirement security and seek justice.”
FOR MORE information, visit:
- Institute of Government and Public Affairs, www.igpa.uillinois.edu.
- Northern Illinois University State Pension and Budget Update, www.niu.edu/statebudget/pension_reform/.
- We Are One Illinois, www.weareoneillinois.org.
- See more at: http://news.uic.edu/illinois-lawmakers-pass-pension-changes-for-state-employees#sthash.VQBV8W3y.dpuf.