And William S. Bike, APAC News
THE ILLINOIS General Assembly
passed pension legislation Dec. 3 that University leaders said would “adversely
impact public university employees, place higher education in Illinois at a
competitive disadvantage, and ultimately weaken the state’s economy.”
THE BILL passed the Senate
30-24 and the House 62-53 just minutes later. Democratic House Speaker Michael Madigan and Republican Senate
leader Christine Radogno, among
other top legislators from both political parties, pushed for the plan.
“IN A statement regarding
the public pension funding crisis a year ago, the University of Illinois called
for a pension system that would be reasonable, responsible, sustainable and
competitive with those offered by our peer institutions,” said a statement issued
by U of I President Robert Easter,
UIC Chancellor Paula Allen-Meares, University
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Chancellor Phyllis
Wise, and University of Illinois at Springfield Chancellor Susan Koch.
THE PENSION measure “fails to
meet those basic principles,” the statement said.
LAST APRIL, heads of all 14
Illinois public universities sent a six-point proposal to Gov. Pat Quinn and legislative leaders as a
long-term solution for reforming the university pension system.
“WE ARE profoundly
disappointed that in nearly three years of engaging the legislative process on
this crucial issue, the State’s nine public universities’ counterproposals will
not be included,” University leaders said.
THE MEASURE passed by
legislators in December is complex, said Katherine
Laing, executive director of the University’s Office of Governmental
Relations. How it would affect UIC employees and retirees “really depends on
your particular circumstances,” she said.
“IT WILL severely upset the
status quo,” Laing said.
THE PENSION law would reduce
cost-of-living adjustments, increase the retirement age for some employees, and
put a cap on pensionable earnings. “The
likely changes arguably lessen the retirement commitments made to employees and
retirees, and their net effect also will harm the public higher education
sector in Illinois,” University leaders said in their statement.
THE PLAN would mean less
money for University employees and retirees, said David Merriman, professor of economics and public administration. “It’s
potentially a very large cut in benefits,” said Merriman, faculty member in the
Institute of Government and Public Affairs.
THE PENSION plan also includes a reduction in employee contributions for some participants and stronger legal requirements that the State makes its pension funding commitment.
“IT WOULD certainly improve
the funding of the pension plan and move it toward stability, but it’s
difficult to tell exactly how much,” Merriman said.
EXPERTS SAY the measure will
be challenged in court because the Illinois Constitution says state retirement
benefits “shall not be diminished or impaired.”
THE WE Are One Illinois
Coalition, a labor coalition working to protect public employees’ pensions,
noted in a Dec. 4 statement that the bill is 325 pages long and passed just 24
hours after legislators received it. The coalition said the bill “robs
teachers, nurses, caregivers, police, and other public employees and retirees
who faithfully made their pension contributions. It’s unfair, unconstitutional
pension theft legislation.”
THE STATEMENT went on to say, “Make
no mistake—we will sue to protect retirement security and seek justice.”
FOR MORE information, visit:
- Institute of Government and Public Affairs, www.igpa.uillinois.edu.
- Northern Illinois University State Pension and Budget Update, www.niu.edu/statebudget/pension_reform/.
- We Are One Illinois, www.weareoneillinois.org.
- See more at: http://news.uic.edu/illinois-lawmakers-pass-pension-changes-for-state-employees#sthash.VQBV8W3y.dpuf.
No comments:
Post a Comment